Review



pp65 rela ser536  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc pp65 rela ser536
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Pp65 Rela Ser536, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2442 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/Histone+H3+Antibody/pmc11226078-89-14-18
    Average 96 stars, based on 2442 article reviews
    pp65 rela ser536 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer"

    Article Title: Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304194

    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) pp65/RelA(Ser276) (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) pp65/RelA(Ser276) (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.

    Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Marker

    (A) Schematic diagram of the Ing4 genome with exons (open boxes); CRISPR/CAS9 gRNAs R1 and M1 mapped to exon 1 and exon 3 (red line). (B) Nuclear accumulation of pp65/RelA in Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells treated with cytokines: v2, the vector control cells; v2R1, R1 gRNA construct cells; v2M1, M1 gRNA construct cells; cells were treated with PBS (-), 10ng/ml TNFa (T), or 10ng/ml IL-1b (I), for 1 hour in serum-free media prior to cell fractionation; nuc, nuclear fraction; cyto, cytoplasmic fraction; Western blot for ING4 and phospho-p65/RelA (ser536); Histone H3 and a-tubulin antibodies were used as the loading controls. (C) Relative fold expression of the mouse Il6 gene in p53MT cells treated with (+) or without (-) TNFa (left panel) or IL-1b (right panel) for 4 hours in serum-free media. Numbers denote the average fold change of a minimum three replicates: open bar, v2; closed bar, v2R1; serrated bar, v2M1; RT-qPCR to quantify Il6 expression using Gapdh as the reference; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; ns , not significant. (D) Cytokine-induced migration of Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells: PBS (-),TNFa (T), or IL-1b (I); v2, v2R1, or v2M1 cells migrated through 8mm pores in the transwell inserts were stained with DAPI and visualized under a fluorescent microscope. Cell numbers were determined by averaging a minimum of 4 images per experiment from at least 3 independent experiments; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic diagram of the Ing4 genome with exons (open boxes); CRISPR/CAS9 gRNAs R1 and M1 mapped to exon 1 and exon 3 (red line). (B) Nuclear accumulation of pp65/RelA in Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells treated with cytokines: v2, the vector control cells; v2R1, R1 gRNA construct cells; v2M1, M1 gRNA construct cells; cells were treated with PBS (-), 10ng/ml TNFa (T), or 10ng/ml IL-1b (I), for 1 hour in serum-free media prior to cell fractionation; nuc, nuclear fraction; cyto, cytoplasmic fraction; Western blot for ING4 and phospho-p65/RelA (ser536); Histone H3 and a-tubulin antibodies were used as the loading controls. (C) Relative fold expression of the mouse Il6 gene in p53MT cells treated with (+) or without (-) TNFa (left panel) or IL-1b (right panel) for 4 hours in serum-free media. Numbers denote the average fold change of a minimum three replicates: open bar, v2; closed bar, v2R1; serrated bar, v2M1; RT-qPCR to quantify Il6 expression using Gapdh as the reference; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; ns , not significant. (D) Cytokine-induced migration of Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells: PBS (-),TNFa (T), or IL-1b (I); v2, v2R1, or v2M1 cells migrated through 8mm pores in the transwell inserts were stained with DAPI and visualized under a fluorescent microscope. Cell numbers were determined by averaging a minimum of 4 images per experiment from at least 3 independent experiments; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05.

    Techniques Used: CRISPR, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Construct, Cell Fractionation, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test, Migration, Staining, Microscopy

    Related Articles

    Western Blot:

    Article Title: Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer
    Article Snippet: .. Antibodies used in Western blots were against: ING4 (BTIM-4 hybridoma supernatant, 1:4 [ ]), pp65/RelA (Ser536) (93H1, 1:1,000; CST), histone H3 (1:5000, CST), and α-tubulin (DM1A, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich). .. HRP-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were used (1:5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and detected using Immobilon ECL Ultra Western HRP Substrate reagents (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO).

    Article Title: Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer
    Article Snippet: .. Antibodies used in Western blots were against: ING4 (BTIM-4 hybridoma supernatant, 1:4 [ ]), pp65/RelA (Ser536) (93H1, 1:1,000; CST), histone H3 (1:5000, CST), and a-tubulin (DM1A, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich). .. HRP-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were used (1:5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and detected using Immobilon ECL Ultra Western HRP Substrate reagents (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO).



    Similar Products

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc pp65 rela ser536
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Pp65 Rela Ser536, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/Histone+H3+Antibody/pmc11226078-89-14-18
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pp65 rela ser536 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti pp65 rela
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Rabbit Anti Pp65 Rela, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Rabbit+mAb/pm35412852-247-29-31
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti pp65 rela - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals antibody to pp65
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Antibody To Pp65, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/RelA%2FNFkB+p65+%5Bp+Ser536%5D+Antibody/pmc06791477-404-2-5
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody to pp65 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc pp65 rela
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Pp65 Rela, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Rabbit+mAb/pm29950720-565-100-101
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pp65 rela - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc pp65 rela primary antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) <t>pp65/RelA(Ser276)</t> (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.
    Pp65 Rela Primary Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/pp65+rela+ser536/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Antibody/pm27548746-142-52-56
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pp65 rela primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) pp65/RelA(Ser276) (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304194

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunohistochemical staining images of tumors positive for: a) ING4 (IHC score +1), b) pp65/RelA(Ser276) (IHC score +2), c) CD68 (IHC score +2), d) CD4 (IHC score +3), e) CD8 (IHC score +2), f) PD-1 (IHC score +3); black boxes in the top panel are presented in higher magnification images in the bottom panel; black scale bars denote 100 mm in length. (B) Percentage of tumors positive for each marker (solid dark bar): ING4 (154/246, 63%), pp65 (84/245, 34%), CD68 (171/193, 89%), CD4 (50/193, 26%), CD8 (75/189, 40%), and PD-1 (24/132, 18%). (C) Venn diagram and table showing the number of tumors positive for CD68, CD8, CD4, and/or PD-1. (D) No association between immune markers with ING4-low vs ING4-high (left graph) or NF-kB-low vs NF-kB-high (right graph) tumors. (E) Increased CD8+ tumors in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (solid dark bar, 59% vs 32–38%); p values were determined by Fisher’s Exact test; ns , not significant. (F) High lymph node positivity in ING4-low/pp65-high tumors (LN+, solid dark bar): All, all tumors; ER-, estrogen receptor-negative.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used in Western blots were against: ING4 (BTIM-4 hybridoma supernatant, 1:4 [ ]), pp65/RelA (Ser536) (93H1, 1:1,000; CST), histone H3 (1:5000, CST), and a-tubulin (DM1A, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Marker

    (A) Schematic diagram of the Ing4 genome with exons (open boxes); CRISPR/CAS9 gRNAs R1 and M1 mapped to exon 1 and exon 3 (red line). (B) Nuclear accumulation of pp65/RelA in Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells treated with cytokines: v2, the vector control cells; v2R1, R1 gRNA construct cells; v2M1, M1 gRNA construct cells; cells were treated with PBS (-), 10ng/ml TNFa (T), or 10ng/ml IL-1b (I), for 1 hour in serum-free media prior to cell fractionation; nuc, nuclear fraction; cyto, cytoplasmic fraction; Western blot for ING4 and phospho-p65/RelA (ser536); Histone H3 and a-tubulin antibodies were used as the loading controls. (C) Relative fold expression of the mouse Il6 gene in p53MT cells treated with (+) or without (-) TNFa (left panel) or IL-1b (right panel) for 4 hours in serum-free media. Numbers denote the average fold change of a minimum three replicates: open bar, v2; closed bar, v2R1; serrated bar, v2M1; RT-qPCR to quantify Il6 expression using Gapdh as the reference; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; ns , not significant. (D) Cytokine-induced migration of Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells: PBS (-),TNFa (T), or IL-1b (I); v2, v2R1, or v2M1 cells migrated through 8mm pores in the transwell inserts were stained with DAPI and visualized under a fluorescent microscope. Cell numbers were determined by averaging a minimum of 4 images per experiment from at least 3 independent experiments; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: Tumor immune microenvironment permissive to metastatic progression of ING4-deficient breast cancer

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304194

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic diagram of the Ing4 genome with exons (open boxes); CRISPR/CAS9 gRNAs R1 and M1 mapped to exon 1 and exon 3 (red line). (B) Nuclear accumulation of pp65/RelA in Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells treated with cytokines: v2, the vector control cells; v2R1, R1 gRNA construct cells; v2M1, M1 gRNA construct cells; cells were treated with PBS (-), 10ng/ml TNFa (T), or 10ng/ml IL-1b (I), for 1 hour in serum-free media prior to cell fractionation; nuc, nuclear fraction; cyto, cytoplasmic fraction; Western blot for ING4 and phospho-p65/RelA (ser536); Histone H3 and a-tubulin antibodies were used as the loading controls. (C) Relative fold expression of the mouse Il6 gene in p53MT cells treated with (+) or without (-) TNFa (left panel) or IL-1b (right panel) for 4 hours in serum-free media. Numbers denote the average fold change of a minimum three replicates: open bar, v2; closed bar, v2R1; serrated bar, v2M1; RT-qPCR to quantify Il6 expression using Gapdh as the reference; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; ns , not significant. (D) Cytokine-induced migration of Ing4 -deleted p53MT cells: PBS (-),TNFa (T), or IL-1b (I); v2, v2R1, or v2M1 cells migrated through 8mm pores in the transwell inserts were stained with DAPI and visualized under a fluorescent microscope. Cell numbers were determined by averaging a minimum of 4 images per experiment from at least 3 independent experiments; p values were determined by two-tailed student t-test; *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used in Western blots were against: ING4 (BTIM-4 hybridoma supernatant, 1:4 [ ]), pp65/RelA (Ser536) (93H1, 1:1,000; CST), histone H3 (1:5000, CST), and a-tubulin (DM1A, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: CRISPR, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Construct, Cell Fractionation, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test, Migration, Staining, Microscopy